Why are these good people turning on each other? Coaching to help you tackle leadership and work culture issues.

Why are these good people turning on each other? Coaching to help you tackle leadership and work culture issues.

Helen McKelvie
Jennifer Burrows

Why are these good people turning on each other?

Coaching to help you tackle leadership and work culture issues.

Helen McKelvie & Jennifer Burrows

Why are these good people turning on each other?

Coaching to help you tackle leadership and work culture issues.

Traditional leadership training can only offer so much when you experience the real challenges of leading: organisational issues, pushback from colleagues, problems that just won’t shift no matter what you do, and difficult dynamics between staff. Most of the time you know what to do as a leader, but there are times when you feel ‘stuck’ and can’t work out why an issue seems to have emerged from nowhere. Having someone to talk to who knows something about organisational dynamics and can think with you about the issues you are facing can be helpful to identify a way forward.

When interpersonal relations become toxic in public service and ‘for purpose’ workplaces, it can feel difficult to reconcile what has happened with the high ideals shared by the caring and committed staff who are now at loggerheads. The conflict somehow feels like it ‘doesn’t belong’ in the organisation, and the mismatch makes it painful and confusing to think it through.

Trish’s Experience of Coaching

This was Trish’s experience as the CEO of a family violence support service, a role she’d held for the last eight years. Trish came to coaching after a number of staff brought a complaint of bullying and micromanaging against their senior manager. Trish was upset and perplexed about how this had happened when the organisation had always been a friendly place to work, with staff being very supportive and caring of each other. While the complaint was being investigated Trish wanted to use the coaching space to understand how something like this could occur in her organisation, and involve such a lovely group of people.

In her coaching sessions, Trish learnt about the ‘parallel process’, a phenomenon in which the dynamics of an organisation’s client group can ‘leak in’ (unconsciously) and be played out within the organisation. In Trish’s organisation, this manifested as staff experiencing management as controlling and abusive, akin to the experience of the women suffering family violence who were the clients of their service. Trish and her coach explored how a parallel process may have been ‘enacted’ in the organisation with the aggrieved staff members and the senior manager as the ‘players’. Making sense of how an unconscious parallel process may occur in an organisation is tricky, but for Trish, this idea rang true – and helped her to understand how a trusted and previously well-respected senior manager had somehow become a ‘bully’ and her staff members ‘victims’. Trish began to recognise how the ‘nice and caring’ culture they valued did not allow for emotions labelled as negative to be expressed and worked with by the staff; emotions like anger, ambition, frustration, and decisiveness were ignored or denied as if they and their negatively amplified manifestations (violence and coercive control) belonged only with the male perpetrators their clients were needing to escape.

Trish started to reflect on how she takes up the authority and power of her CEO role, and how what she suppresses can emerge as passive-aggressive behaviour. She saw the need to expand the opportunity for reflective space so the organisation’s senior leaders and managers can explore their authority relationships with their staff and each other. They went on to organise a consultant to run a series of workshops to do this exploration as part of developing a culture in which they can engage with the whole spectrum of human behaviour, not just the ‘nice’ side.

Coaching for Leadership and Work Culture

If you are looking to do things differently and really develop your leadership potential, working with a qualified and experienced NIODA coach could help to shift your thinking and take you in a new direction. The starting point can be whatever aspect of your leadership or work culture is important to you to spend time reflecting on. You’re the expert when it comes to knowing what you need to work on and what is happening in your organisation. Or perhaps you know from others’ feedback that there are aspects of your role that need some attention. Committing to coaching gives you the dedicated space and time to reflect with an informed and experienced coach so that what you know makes more sense and you feel confident to take action.

For more information about NIODA’s Coaching service visit the webpage.

Click here to book a free conversation with one of our coaches to see if NIODA coaching is right for you.

If you would like to know more about how NIODA can tailor a Leadership Development workshop series for your organisation click here.

 

NIODA Coaching – Helen McKelvie and Jennifer Burrows

April 2023

Why are these good people turning on each other? Coaching to help you tackle leadership and work culture issues.

Why are these good people turning on each other? Coaching to help you tackle leadership and work culture issues.

Helen McKelvie

Helen McKelvie

Learning Activities Lead, NIODA

Helen McKelvie is the Learning Activities Lead and a member of the Executive at NIODA, and is a teacher in and a graduate of the Master of Leadership and Management (Organisation Dynamics) program. She brings over 25 years of her own experience of working in organisations to her coaching and consulting services in leadership development and organisational change. Roles as internal consultant, policy and project manager, and lawyer in workplaces in both the public and private sectors have provided her with first-hand experience of the complexity and challenges in organisational life.

Helen is passionate about improving workplace dynamics to contribute to better organisational outcomes and to benefit the working lives of those who make up organisations. She works with leaders and teams helping them enquire into workplace dilemmas to uncover and work with system issues and hidden dynamics that may be inhibiting role clarity and collaborative work. Helen uses a systems psychodynamic approach to create reflective space for respectful communication and connection, opening up possibility for greater alignment with organisational, and team role and purpose.

Jennifer Burrows is the Educational Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager at NIODA. In her consulting practice, Jennifer brings systems thinking and a socioanalytic lens to help organisations and individuals thrive in complex environments. Jennifer has extensive experience leading change innovations, supporting teams working in challenging environments, and providing organizational consulting. Jennifer also offers coaching to individuals, both Organisational Role Analysis (ORA) and Anaytical-Network Coaching.

Jennifer holds a Master’s in Philosophy of Social Innovation (Organisational Analysis & Leadership) through the Grubb School of Organisational Analysis, as well as a Master of Business (Training & Change Management). Jennifer is a Board member of Annecto, a not-for-profit age and disability support organisation, and a Director of Group Relations Australia.

Jennifer Burrows

Jennifer Burrows

Education Quality Assurance and Enhancement Lead, NIODA

About NIODA

The National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA) offers internationally renowned post-graduate education and research in organisation dynamics, and decades of experience consulting with Australian organisations. 

The study of organisation dynamics brings together socio-technical and psychoanalytic disciplines to explore the unconscious dynamics that exist in every group, team or organisation. Learning more about these theories, and reflecting on the experience of them, can support leaders and managers to unlock great potential in their organisations, tackling issues through a whole new light.

PO Box 287, Collins Street West,
Melbourne  8007  Australia
+61 (0) 414 529 867
info@nioda.org.au

NIODA acknowledges the Kulin Nations, and respective Traditional Custodians of the lands we work on.
We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and recognise their enduring sovereignty which has, and continues to, care for Country.
NIODA welcomes the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s invitation to walk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a collective movement for a better future.

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

Helen McKelvie

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

Helen McKelvie

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

Organisations with structures and cultures that seem to perpetuate cycles of dysfunction and distress is something we hear about in our work at NIODA. Even as successive leaders and staff churn through, incidents of workplace bullying, toxic work environment, or ineffective leadership seem to recur. Re-structures and culture change efforts have little appreciable effect. Indeed, sometimes they have created more challenges.

A useful lens to apply to such long running issues can be that of intergenerational trauma: the transmission of the effects of trauma from one generation to the next. Psychiatrists and researchers tell us that a traumatic event, or the cumulative effects of traumatic stress, can create a ‘wounding’ psychologically, emotionally or physically that is experienced across generations. Trauma experts talk of trauma as “contagious”. Family members, workplaces and communities, share the same culture, the same environment, the same traumas, and so are vulnerable to the same or similar reactions. In this way underlying traumatic wounds shape the trajectories of successive generations.

Vamik Volkan, a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, has extensively studied the impact of trauma on large groups, particularly in the context of societal conflicts and historical events (2004, 2017). He argues that collective trauma can become embedded within a group’s cultural identity and can be transmitted across generations, shaping the group’s beliefs, values, and behaviours. Volkan notes that large groups often use symbolism and mythology to construct narratives around traumatic events, which can serve as a way of processing and making sense of the trauma. However, these narratives can also contribute to the perpetuation of intergenerational trauma if they reinforce a victim mentality or justify aggression towards others.

Healing from intergenerational trauma involves recognising the impact of trauma and providing support that addresses the unique needs of the individuals and communities. To address the impact of trauma on large groups, Volkan emphasises the importance of promoting empathy and understanding between different groups. He suggests that by creating opportunities for dialogue and promoting a culture of acceptance and tolerance, groups can break free from cycles of conflict and trauma and move towards a more peaceful and resilient future.

One key element in healing from intergenerational trauma is acknowledging its existence and understanding how it has impacted individuals and communities. In Australia it feels like we are starting to do this work between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people, with the ongoing trauma of colonisation being acknowledged and the intergenerational effects recognised. In Victoria the Yoorook Justice Commission is undertaking Australia’s first formal truth-telling process into historical and ongoing injustices experienced by our First Peoples. The Commission’s mandate is to: establish an official record of the impact of colonisation on Traditional Owners and First Peoples in Victoria; develop a shared understanding among all Victorians of the impact of colonisation, as well as the diversity, strength and resilience of First Peoples’ cultures; and to make recommendations for healing, system reform and practical changes to laws, policy and education, as well as to matters to be included in future treaties.

A small (non-Aboriginal) group made up of NIODA staff, Board members and close associates have been attentively following the Yoorook hearings; a fortnightly zoom gathering is spent listening deeply to the witness stories that are posted on the Commission’s website, and exploring the group members’ experience of the listening process. This has become important work for the individuals in the group, creating a ‘potential space’, a safe environment for exploring difficult feelings and where creative and adaptive responses are possible. For NIODA, the learning from this potential space is informing the work we will do under our Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP), which has recently been approved by Reconciliation Australia. We are keen to play our part in helping to heal the intergenerational trauma borne by our First Peoples and which holds us all back as a country. We hope to write more about what’s happening with our RAP soon.

Another initiative for understanding and working with intergenerational trauma is an upcoming workshop series we are hosting at NIODA: “Through trauma towards creative innovations”. The workshops will be run by two eminent practitioners in our field, Jerry Fromm and Richard Morgan-Jones, and is closely informed by Jerry’s recent book: “Traveling Through Time: How Trauma Plays Itself Out in Families, Organizations and Society”. The book explores the impact of trauma on individuals, families, and larger social systems. It also examines the ways in which trauma affects organisations, such as schools and businesses, and how these institutions can respond to trauma in healthy and constructive ways.

The workshops, held in six sessions over three weeks (April – May), will explore the nature of trauma, and create the space for participants to engage in (im)possible dialogues, which may be between parts of the self, between groups or between generations, and the way in which trauma shapes large group identity. There will also be opportunity to contemplate creative innovations and new beginnings, through the establishment of potential space and some of the dynamics that occur within it. The experiential parts of the workshop will utilise the method Richard developed to help individuals and organisations identify and navigate their underlying motivations, values, and beliefs, the ‘Trilogy Matrix Event’. This method offers a potential integration of perspectives from across individual, group and contextual dynamics.

This workshop series will be a safely held space to explore painful truths about the ways in which trauma can shape family and organisational dynamics, cultural practices, and social systems. We warmly invite you to join us for this powerful work. It is a chance to develop our understanding of ourselves and our skills for uncovering and working with the intergenerational trauma that may be at the heart of recurrent cycles of dysfunction in the organisations and communities we work with.

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment? For innovative trauma-informed solutions, join us for the NIODA workshop series here: “Through trauma towards creative innovations”.

Vamik Volkan’s work:
Blind Trust: Large Groups and Their Leaders in Times of Crisis and Terror (2004)
Enemies on the Couch: A Psychopolitical Journey Through War and Peace (2017)

Helen McKelvie

April 2023

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

Helen McKelvie

Helen McKelvie

Learning Activities Lead, NIODA

Helen McKelvie is the Learning Activities Lead and a member of the Executive at NIODA, and is a teacher in and a graduate of the Master of Leadership and Management (Organisation Dynamics) program. She brings over 25 years of her own experience of working in organisations to her coaching and consulting services in leadership development and organisational change. Roles as internal consultant, policy and project manager, and lawyer in workplaces in both the public and private sectors have provided her with first-hand experience of the complexity and challenges in organisational life.
Helen is passionate about improving workplace dynamics to contribute to better organisational outcomes and to benefit the working lives of those who make up organisations. She works with leaders and teams helping them enquire into workplace dilemmas to uncover and work with system issues and hidden dynamics that may be inhibiting role clarity and collaborative work. Helen uses a systems psychodynamic approach to create reflective space for respectful communication and connection, opening up possibility for greater alignment with organisational, and team role and purpose.

Is trauma causing your toxic work environment?

About NIODA

The National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA) offers internationally renowned post-graduate education and research in organisation dynamics, and decades of experience consulting with Australian organisations. 

The study of organisation dynamics brings together socio-technical and psychoanalytic disciplines to explore the unconscious dynamics that exist in every group, team or organisation. Learning more about these theories, and reflecting on the experience of them, can support leaders and managers to unlock great potential in their organisations, tackling issues through a whole new light.

PO Box 287, Collins Street West,
Melbourne  8007  Australia
+61 (0) 414 529 867
info@nioda.org.au

NIODA acknowledges the Kulin Nations, and respective Traditional Custodians of the lands we work on.
We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and recognise their enduring sovereignty which has, and continues to, care for Country.
NIODA welcomes the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s invitation to walk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a collective movement for a better future.

Leadership Skills for the Hybrid Workplace: Optimising the new normal

Leadership Skills for the Hybrid Workplace: Optimising the new normal

Optimising the new normal:

Leadership skills for the hybrid workplace

An immersive workshop series for people managers

The pandemic has fundamentally changed the nature of work, particularly for managers and leaders who are adapting to working with co-located and dispersed teams with some or all employees having the flexibility to choose where and when they work. Going back to pre-pandemic management is not an option. The ‘new normal’ hybrid workplace has disrupted established assumptions about the nature of work and what motivates workers, and it has highlighted the challenge of finding the right leadership skills for the hybrid workplace – a balance between hierarchical and lateral authority.

Leaders and managers need to adapt their thinking about the hybrid workplace,
and learn new skills to help them take up their staff management role and responsibilities.

Research has identified the need to build cohesion among staff working together from disparate locations, to fend off burnout, promote wellness, and strengthen shared culture. Leaders need support to create a human-centric way of working that puts people at the centre of their hybrid work strategy (Work 3.0 Reimagining Leadership in a Hybrid World, 2022).

NIODA’s ‘Optimising the new normal: Leadership Skills for the Hybrid Workplace’ immersive workshop series develops the capacity to manage the hybrid workplace boundaries around flexibility, authority and identity to support staff well-being and safety, as well as productivity.

Through these workshops, people managers will be able to:

  1. Recognise the complexity of hybrid workplace dynamics
  2. Apply frameworks to address the challenges facing your team
  3. Develop leadership and management skills to manage effectively in the hybrid workplace
  4. Reflect on your ongoing skill development needs to support your management practice.

Workshops:

Workshop One – What’s happening in our workplaces? Identifying the dynamics of the hybrid team.
Workshop Two – Locating the new boundaries of the hybrid workplace: working with authority, task, identity and political boundaries.
Workshop Three – Understanding your team as a social network for greater connection and cohesion
Workshop Four – The Containing Leader: leadership and management skills for a hybrid workplace

When and where people managers can
develop leadership skills for the hybrid workplace

Four x 2.5-hour workshops over 8 weeks with 6 to 8 participants

This workshop series format supports working with participants’ current workplace challenges to make changes and improvements during the 8-week period.

The sessions are fully interactive and can be onsite in Melbourne CBD, or online via zoom. Each two-and-a-half-hour workshop includes a short seminar, experiential learning activity, group discussion and reflection for integrating learning and planning action back in the workplace.

An ‘Optimising the new normal: Leadership Skills for the Hybrid Workplace’ workbook is provided for note-taking, capturing planned action, drawing and reflecting on the application between workshops. It also contains a summary of the theory for easy reference, current research on the hybrid workplace, and key articles for further reading. 

Optimising the new normal:
Leadership skills for the hybrid workplace

An immersive workshop series for people managers

NIODA’s highly experienced staff are leading this new hybrid workplace training program. Facilitators include:

    Ms Helen McKelvie

    Helen McKelvie

    Helen has had over 25 years of working in organisations to inform her approach to helping others gain insights into how they take up roles and how to achieve greater alignment with individual, team and organisational purpose. Her own roles as internal planning consultant, policy and project manager, and lawyer in workplaces in both the public and private sectors have provided her with first-hand experience of the complexity and challenges of organisational life.

    Helen is an alumnus and now teaches in the Master’s program at the National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA). She also has a Bachelor of Laws and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Melbourne. In addition to her academic qualifications, Helen is an accredited practitioner of PRISM Brain Mapping, an online, neuroscience-based behaviour mapping instrument, and is a registered Analytic-Network Coach. Helen also has training and experience in workplace mediation and yoga teaching qualifications.

    Ms Jennifer Burrows

    Jennifer Burrows

    Jennifer brings systems thinking and a socio analytic lens to help organisations and individuals thrive in complex environments. As a consultant and coach, she works collaboratively, holding the tension between leaving space for emergence and achieving the desired outcomes, using the unique situation and presenting needs as the starting point. The co-created results are relevant, immediately applicable and owned by the participants.

    Jennifer has extensive experience working in the education sector leading change innovations, as well as with Boards of not-for-profit companies. She holds a Master in Philosophy of Social Innovation (Organisational Analysis & Leadership) through the Grubb School of Organisational Analysis, as well as a Master of Business (Training & Change Management) and other qualifications in education. She is a Board member of a not-for-profit age and disability support organisation, and a Director of Group Relations Australia.

    Mr Thomas Mitchell

    Thomas Mitchell

    Over the last several years Thomas has enhanced his extensive professional experience by learning from, and working with, leaders across the executive coaching, group dynamics, and systems psychodynamics fields. A graduate of the NIODA Master of Leadership and Management – Organisation Dynamics, Thomas combines a deep understanding of working in large organisations with a passion for supporting others as they work toward achieving their goals and gaining a deeper awareness of their actions and drivers. Highly skilled in creating a safe environment to support participants explore their roles, Thomas manages the balance between empathy and candour allowing participants to feel secure whilst having their assumptions challenged.

    About NIODA

    The National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA) offers internationally renowned post-graduate education and research in organisation dynamics, and decades of experience consulting with Australian organisations. 

    The study of organisation dynamics brings together socio-technical and psychoanalytic disciplines to explore the unconscious dynamics that exist in every group, team or organisation. Learning more about these theories, and reflecting on the experience of them, can support leaders and managers to unlock great potential in their organisations, tackling issues through a whole new light.

    PO Box 287, Collins Street West,
    Melbourne  8007  Australia
    +61 (0) 414 529 867
    info@nioda.org.au

    NIODA acknowledges the Kulin Nations, and respective Traditional Custodians of the lands we work on.
    We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and recognise their enduring sovereignty which has, and continues to, care for Country.
    NIODA welcomes the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s invitation to walk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a collective movement for a better future.

    The shadow of our limiting beliefs

    The shadow of our limiting beliefs

    The shadow of our limiting beliefs

    Sunitha Lal

    The shadow of our limiting beliefs

    At a Group Relations Conference two years back, the Primary Task was: to study the exercise of authority in the taking up of roles through the interpersonal, inter-group, and institutional relations that develop within the conference as an organisation, within its wider context.

    During this conference, the identities I was recognized by were ‘woman’, ‘middle aged’, and ‘brown’. What struck me is that these labels are given as a limiting force by the system. I agree that I am brown and I am middle-aged – but that defines ‘what is’; it does not limit me.
    Here is my experience regarding two separate incidents at this conference, in the space of these identities:

    Incident 1:

    In the Large study group where the entire group met, the seating arrangement was that of two spirals in double-coil format. For a few days, men took the centre of the spiral. Nothing moved forward in the group, we were neither exploring nor discussing, and there was this feeling of being stuck. With some planning, one fine day, we women took over the centre of the spiral.

    As we were sitting in the centre and enjoying what we have achieved, the group started slowly waking up to the reality of what happened. A new reality. Some were congratulating us, some were seeing us in a new light; there was some recognition and appreciation. The earlier occupants were stunned and were lamenting how the middle-aged women took over their seats and that they were feeling emasculated. There was also a discussion on how all the women sitting in the centre were middle-aged, and the young women were left out.

    At that moment, one voice from the further end of the spiral asked

    “Are you planning to do anything? I understand you took over the space but what are you going to do now?”

    She was young and I could sense disappointment. When men occupied the centre-stage, nothing more was expected, but with women occupying it, something more was demanded. That too from other women. There was disappointment for not achieving more and ambivalence towards the formation of alliances with the older women.

    The ‘middle-aged women’- I wonder what we represented – the mothers they resented? Shame if we were not cool enough or effective enough? Is it envy or competition? Also, in patriarchal systems, men use women as gate-keepers to keep the outliers inline – no one should stray, no one can reach forward, no moonshots.

    Incident 2:

    In a separate inter-group event, my colleague and I went to the group that called themselves a diversity group. As I started speaking, they were looking at my colleague and responding to her. It was almost like I was not there. Later, I went to the same group requesting them for a meeting. I shared the need for the meeting, our request, the task, venue and time. But when we met them, they asked basic questions as if I had not shared all the information earlier. It was puzzling. My colleague and I explored this with the members from the diversity group.

    The three women from the diversity group accepted that they were not able to see me in a leadership position, as I was brown. They were able to respond to my colleague who was Caucasian and were not able to acknowledge what I was saying. Interestingly, two in that group were from the UK, the colonizer, and I am from India, the colonized. Later, one of them apologized profusely.

    Reminiscence

    When we are in a group it is not about the self, it is about what’s happening in the group, the organization, or institution. Where is the intersecting point? When you can’t see me or hear me, where will we meet to know each other? There is an unconscious and immediate negation of mutual recognition. That was the question that haunted me.

    Moreover, I had a choice in whether I wanted to feel limited, labeled, judged or cheated. But in many ways, these identities are part of what I am. I felt proud and centred as I embraced them. Also, what I am today does not stop the million possibilities of what I can become in the future – and it is into this beautiful future that I walk forward and onward.

    Sunitha Lal

    October 2021

    The shadow of our limiting beliefs

    Finding our Moorings during Uncertain Times

    Sunitha Lal, MLM

    NIODA Group Relations Conference staff member

     

    Sunitha Lal is the CHRO at Ather Energy and has more than twenty-five years’ of experience in the space of organisational development and people practices. She actively engages with and contributes to forums and platforms that focus on building Culture, Diversity & Inclusion, Mindful Leadership, and Organisational Behaviour. She has participated in GR conferences and workshops as a member and staff since 2015 and is an Associate Member of Group Relations India. She is a strong proponent of the oral tradition of storytelling and is the author of the book ‘Dotting the Blemish and Other Stories’, a collection of short stories about women’s lives embedded in patriarchy.

    Complexity, Creativity and Community in a Networked World

    NIODA Group Relations Online Working Conference

    Introductory Session: Familiarisation with the technology
    Wednesday 3 November 2021

    3 – 5 pm Melbourne 🇨🇰
    4 – 6 am London 🇬🇧
    12 – 2 pm Singapore 🇸🇬
    12 – 2 am New York 🇺🇸
    9:30 – 11:30 am New Delhi 🇮🇳

    Live Interactive online Conference:
    Monday 8 – Wednesday 10 November 2021 and Friday 12 November

    10 am – 4 pm Melbourne 🇨🇰
    11 pm – 5 am London 🇬🇧
    7 am – 1 pm Singapore 🇸🇬
    7 pm – 1 am New York 🇺🇸
    4:30 – 10:30 am New Delhi 🇮🇳

    FEES
    Full fee AUD$1,500
    NIODA Alumni/AODA Members/ Group Relations Australia Members AUD$1,200
    2 or more people from the same organisation AUD$1,200

    BURSARIES
    Please contact Ellie Robinson, Director of Administration for
    information about partial bursaries for those unable to meet the full amount.
    GRC@nioda.org.au

    About NIODA

    The National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA) offers internationally renowned post-graduate education and research in organisation dynamics, and decades of experience consulting with Australian organisations. 

    The study of organisation dynamics brings together socio-technical and psychoanalytic disciplines to explore the unconscious dynamics that exist in every group, team or organisation. Learning more about these theories, and reflecting on the experience of them, can support leaders and managers to unlock great potential in their organisations, tackling issues through a whole new light.

    PO Box 287, Collins Street West,
    Melbourne  8007  Australia
    +61 (0) 414 529 867
    info@nioda.org.au

    NIODA acknowledges the Kulin Nations, and respective Traditional Custodians of the lands we work on.
    We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and recognise their enduring sovereignty which has, and continues to, care for Country.
    NIODA welcomes the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s invitation to walk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a collective movement for a better future.

    COVID, Our Teacher

    COVID, Our Teacher

    COVID, Our Teacher

    Dr James Krantz 

    COVID, Our Teacher

    A recent newscast about ‘COVID’ panic brought to mind an article that impressed me as an undergraduate 50 years ago. It said that, during the Great Depression, people loved each other more because they had to rely upon one another. My comments here attempt to unpack this as it pertains to our current situation.

    On reflection, it seems the show was mis-titled. Instead of panic, I would say fear, which is, of course, as vital an emotion for survival as love. The instinctual impulse of self-preservation is built into our nervous systems. Not the neurotic fears that we work to resolve, but the fear
    that alerts us to real danger and mobilizes us to flee or fight. It is survival through self-preservation; love, on the other hand, is survival through embrace of the other.

    Fear and Love – an essential tension

    I see fear and love as polar opposites, inescapably harnessed to one another. The dance of fear and love is the interdependence of self and other, of the individual and the collective , of self-interest and public interest. Neither exists without the other.

    It’s an interdependence that holds the (potentially creative) tension of opposites. Idealizing or debasing either denies the complexity of the human condition. Through holding the tension, and tolerating the resulting anxiety, we can engage the world as whole people. Holding the complexity allows us to fully inhabit our roles as citizens.

    COVID is both a mirror of who we are and a portal to a new unknown. It reveals hard truths and reshapes social reality. How we handle the reciprocal dynamic of fear and love will have a lot to say about how we ultimately cross the threshold on which we now stand. As T.S. Eliot said: “Everyone gets the experience. Some get the lesson.”
    How we handle it will have a lot to say about whether we emerge on a path toward democratic principles or head further toward the politics of inequality and tribalism.

    Democracy requires us to think about our roles as citizens much like our roles as parents, caring both for ourselves and for the other. Citizenship involves recognizing the difference, tending to our own needs as well as those of society. Whether we will learn something about embracing both the importance of self-preservation and community wellbeing is an important COVID question. The stakes are very high.

    The role of leadership

    Leadership enters the equation as an essential “third” that helps us contain the dread and anxiety that colors our world today. Leadership that provides emotional containment by treating others as adults – telling the truth, putting experience into perspective, acknowledging heartbreak and sad tradeoffs, and helping people embrace the necessity of both fear and love.

    Effective leadership helps us transform the experience into the lesson and it supports our ability to think rather than panic. True leaders invite us into reflective space, a crucible for the sort of engagement that enables ethical choice and mature action. Leaders help us remain in what Bion (1970) called negative capability, referring to a state of mind that enables us to stay alive, open-minded and reflective in the face of doubt and uncertainty. By tolerating the emotional distress, we avoid hasty reactions, premature responses, or the siren song of the
    latest “answer” or “certainty.”

    Absent leadership, pathological expressions of fear and love will likely fill the void, as we see in many arenas. Without it, we are more easily drawn to narratives that seal over the shame and grief that COVID has brought us. Narratives that simplify and scapegoat. Without the generativity of reflective space, the residue of trauma and unresolved mourning will linger as corrosive, repressed memories.

    Our particular moment

    While pandemics have universal qualities, they are also particular to their own historical moment. Paradoxically, now we are together by being apart. We affirm solidarity through distance; togetherness through separateness. All of which casts the fear-love dialectic in an unusual light.

    I believe we can thank social media for helping us keep the need for both in mind by enabling us to connect in our isolation. While we rightfully worry about the detachment created by relating through screens in ordinary times, for the moment we can see something containing about how technology helps communities come together in the midst of the pandemic and keeping hope alive.

    Hope, as with fear and love, is essential to our ability to find redemptive solutions. When Pandora opened her box (often claimed out of curiosity, not malice) she inflicted pandemics, disease, death and all manner of evil on humankind. When she closed the vessel, only Hope remained: “within her unbreakable house.” It’s on the topic of hope that I will conclude.

    There is much to worry about in terms of the post-COVID world. The bleaker realities of human nature may very well hold sway. To a great degree, baser motives are propelling action rather than higher ideals. Nevertheless, I have some hope that we will emerge with a deeper awareness of our connectedness.

    As individuals, it may leave us with a bit more humility and a greater awareness of our vulnerability. If so, we will be more receptive to each other and more careful as citizens. And as a result, we will be more resilient. Perhaps less eager to reach for simplistic narratives that see
    people only for their flaws or their virtues.

    Let’s hope the vivid exposure of social inequality will find its way into policy. As perhaps will be appreciation of how much we depend on those who are often discounted and how much we depend on those who care for others on our behalf. We will be stronger if we develop a new appreciation of the importance of robust institutions, especially now seeing how degraded they have become. It is important to note that while people didn’t create the virus, we did create the systems and networks giving this pandemic its unique quality. COVID has exposed how traditional approaches to control and management are ill-suited for today’s realities.
    Addressing the problems arising from the pandemic requires new levels of global cooperation.

    At the societal level, we urgently need to learn from COVID about the dynamics arising in our globalized, densely interconnected world. About how complexity, creativity and community coalesce to shape our increasingly networked world. Learning to approach our world with a systems mindset, one that recognizes how limited our control actually is, and learning to live with the realities of global interdependence, may be the most important lesson that the virus offers us. If we don’t learn about these unpredictable and precarious dynamics from COVID, then we will most certainly confront them at far greater scale and with far greater tragedy with climate change.

    Our most intractable problems are rooted in multiple interacting systems. I look forward to the upcoming NIODA conference to help me better understand both the conscious and unconscious aspects of these forces.

    Dr James Krantz

    October 2021

    COVID, Our Teacher

    Kim Krantz

    James Krantz PhD

    NIODA Group Relations Conference staff member

     

    James Krantz is an organizational consultant and researcher from New York, where he is Managing Principal of Worklab, a consulting firm focusing on strategy implementation and leadership development. His principal interests are with the impact of emerging trends on the exercise of leadership and authority; the social and technical dimensions of new forms of work organization; and the unconscious background to work and organizational life. Currently, Jim serves as Honorary Professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow; Chair, Editorial Committee of the Journal of Organisational and Social Dynamics; and Faculty, Dynamics of Consulting at the Wharton School.

    Complexity, Creativity and Community in a Networked World

    NIODA Group Relations Online Working Conference

    Introductory Session: Familiarisation with the technology
    Wednesday 3 November 2021

    3 – 5 pm Melbourne 🇨🇰
    4 – 6 am London 🇬🇧
    12 – 2 pm Singapore 🇸🇬
    12 – 2 am New York 🇺🇸
    9:30 – 11:30 am New Delhi 🇮🇳

    Live Interactive online Conference:
    Monday 8 – Wednesday 10 November 2021 and Friday 12 November

    10 am – 4 pm Melbourne 🇨🇰
    11 pm – 5 am London 🇬🇧
    7 am – 1 pm Singapore 🇸🇬
    7 pm – 1 am New York 🇺🇸
    4:30 – 10:30 am New Delhi 🇮🇳

    FEES
    Full fee AUD$1,500
    NIODA Alumni/AODA Members/ Group Relations Australia Members AUD$1,200
    2 or more people from the same organisation AUD$1,200

    BURSARIES
    Please contact Ellie Robinson, Director of Administration for
    information about partial bursaries for those unable to meet the full amount.
    GRC@nioda.org.au

    About NIODA

    The National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA) offers internationally renowned post-graduate education and research in organisation dynamics, and decades of experience consulting with Australian organisations. 

    The study of organisation dynamics brings together socio-technical and psychoanalytic disciplines to explore the unconscious dynamics that exist in every group, team or organisation. Learning more about these theories, and reflecting on the experience of them, can support leaders and managers to unlock great potential in their organisations, tackling issues through a whole new light.

    PO Box 287, Collins Street West,
    Melbourne  8007  Australia
    +61 (0) 414 529 867
    info@nioda.org.au

    NIODA acknowledges the Kulin Nations, and respective Traditional Custodians of the lands we work on.
    We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and recognise their enduring sovereignty which has, and continues to, care for Country.
    NIODA welcomes the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s invitation to walk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a collective movement for a better future.

    What does it take to be vulnerable online?

    What does it take to be vulnerable online?

    What does it take to be vulnerable online?

    Thomas Mitchell

    What does it take to be vulnerable online?

    I find myself wondering about this again and again. The question hits me as if it were the question of the week, the year even. I look around as if it has been boomed out over loudspeakers to a crowd who have all been stopped in their tracks by the sheer brilliance of it. In my fantasy, they collectively think, ‘Ah… yes, that is the question,’ and then they rush off home and do something with this information and, miraculously, things get better. In reality, however, there are no crowds, no recognition of the manner in which being a little more vulnerable might help an online group or community operate differently, or release some of the anxiety it is holding, or spark some creativity.

    It is 2021 and in Victoria, Australia we are in the midst of another lockdown. We are only allowed outside our homes for one of 5 reasons. For the vast majority of us, this does not include going to work. There is a curfew between the hours of 9 pm and 5 am. The days can lose definition. Time seems a little out of whack, how is it that late in the day? How is it September? Clips of politicians talking about case numbers, restrictions, and ducking and weaving in and out of veiled blame games are being played on high rotation. One day bleeds into another.

    Without a day punctuated by the physicality of movement and vociferous and lively interaction outside the home, it all becomes a bit of a haze, a little fuzzy, not just around the edges, but through and through. The recent introduction of the curfew in Melbourne took me by surprise and is the thing that shook me out of the fuzziness. The announcement came in the middle of the day, it was to be introduced that evening. I had plans, that evening. I learnt that I needed to cancel my plans through a work meeting. As I entered the Zoom room, colleagues were talking about the curfew and what it meant. As it became clear to me what my colleagues were talking about, I felt a deep anger at the imposition of what felt to be a draconian law.

    More media connections, less human connections

    Focus on work tasks grew over the following days, more Zooms, more reports, more things, more media connections, less human connections, less reality. My team slipped into, for a short while at least, basic assumption dependency (Bion, 1961). We looked to the leader as some sort of seer who would, without any substantive input from us, make decisions. As a part of this same dynamic, we created an inadequate member, an object of care within the group (Lawrence et al., 1996). In this environment, I became more and more anxious about the morning ritual of watching the email inbox expand to a sea of unread mail each time it refreshed, of clicking open the first Zoom screen and seeing myself in reverse, of negotiating with a supplier, a potential supplier, and my boss. One day I found myself, metaphorically, wondering/wandering somewhat confusedly around between workspaces, one online Zoom meeting after another.

    Creating Community

    In this confused state, I participated in an early morning, online meditation session. This is part of my daily routine. Apart from the voice of the person leading the session, the meditation space is silent. We do not talk or engage in overly lively or obvious forms of ‘community’ interaction. For the 30 minutes we are together each morning, however, we are together. We are communing, we are connecting in an intentional, synchronous practice. Creating community. In silence, we let each other in. I compare this with my experience of the online team meeting which is loud and seemingly engaged. It moves quickly, tasks to discuss, to track, to complete. My experience is not one of communion, or of community. If there is an invitation to create together it is hard to hear, and harder still to action, in this environment.

    Moving between these realities offered the opportunity to reflect on the environments, to ponder the differences and to wonder, what does it take to be vulnerable online? My most recent experience tells me that it’s ‘simple’, I needed to let the humanity back in. I needed to scratch the Zoom surface to get a glimpse, to give a glimpse, of what is behind the camera. One day, I loosened my grip just enough and admitted to my colleagues that ‘things are tough’ and that I was struggling with the latest restrictions. Collectively, we started talking about our anxieties, not just those related to the pandemic but also those about the work tasks filling up our inboxes. As Leonard Cohen (1992) says,

    “Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That’s how the light gets in”.

    As the light began to seep in, we began moving toward creativity and it became possible to talk to each other, to ask questions, to admit to not knowing. As we let the humanity into the Zoom room, we also gave rise to the possibility of the basic assumption group encountering the creativity of the work group. A shift occurred, there was a tickle of connection, of resourcefulness, of creation. It is tender and new and imperfect, let’s hope it continues.

    Mr Thomas Mitchell

    October 2021

    What does it take to be vulnerable online?

    Bion, W., 1961. Experiences in groups, and other papers. Tavistock/Routledge, London.

    Cohen, L., 1992. Anthem [WWW Document]. MusixMatch. URL
    https://www.musixmatch.com/lyrics/Leonard-Cohen/Anthem (accessed 8.25.21).

    Lawrence, G., Gould, L., Bain, A., 1996. The Fifth Basic Assumption. Free Associations 6, 1–20.

    Mr Thomas Mitchell

    Thomas Mitchell

    Academic staff member, NIODA

     

    BA, MA(HPS), MLM(OD)  Over the last several years Thomas has enhanced his extensive professional experience by learning from, and working with, leaders across the executive coaching, group dynamics, and systems psychodynamics fields. A graduate of the NIODA Master of Leadership and Management – Organisation Dynamics, Thomas combines a deep understanding of working in large organisations with a passion for supporting others as they work toward achieving their goals and gaining deeper awareness of their actions and drivers. Highly skilled in creating a safe environment to support participants explore their roles, Thomas manages the balance between empathy and candour allowing participants to feel secure whilst having their assumptions challenged.

    Complexity, Creativity and Community in a Networked World

    NIODA Group Relations Online Working Conference

    Introductory Session: Familiarisation with the technology
    Wednesday 3 November 2021

    3 – 5 pm Melbourne 🇨🇰
    4 – 6 am London 🇬🇧
    12 – 2 pm Singapore 🇸🇬
    12 – 2 am New York 🇺🇸
    9:30 – 11:30 am New Delhi 🇮🇳

    Live Interactive online Conference:
    Monday 8 – Wednesday 10 November 2021 and Friday 12 November

    10 am – 4 pm Melbourne 🇨🇰
    11 pm – 5 am London 🇬🇧
    7 am – 1 pm Singapore 🇸🇬
    7 pm – 1 am New York 🇺🇸
    4:30 – 10:30 am New Delhi 🇮🇳

    FEES
    Full fee AUD$1,500
    NIODA Alumni/AODA Members/ Group Relations Australia Members AUD$1,200
    2 or more people from the same organisation AUD$1,200

    BURSARIES
    Please contact Ellie Robinson, Director of Administration for
    information about partial bursaries for those unable to meet the full amount.
    GRC@nioda.org.au

    About NIODA

    The National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia (NIODA) offers internationally renowned post-graduate education and research in organisation dynamics, and decades of experience consulting with Australian organisations. 

    The study of organisation dynamics brings together socio-technical and psychoanalytic disciplines to explore the unconscious dynamics that exist in every group, team or organisation. Learning more about these theories, and reflecting on the experience of them, can support leaders and managers to unlock great potential in their organisations, tackling issues through a whole new light.

    PO Box 287, Collins Street West,
    Melbourne  8007  Australia
    +61 (0) 414 529 867
    info@nioda.org.au

    NIODA acknowledges the Kulin Nations, and respective Traditional Custodians of the lands we work on.
    We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and recognise their enduring sovereignty which has, and continues to, care for Country.
    NIODA welcomes the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s invitation to walk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in a collective movement for a better future.

    Pin It on Pinterest